Bibtex
Cite as text
@Select Types{,
Journal = "Band-1",
Title= "Dynamic Capabilities as the Key Approach to Investigate Digital Ecosystems",
Author= "Franziska Götz, Christian Hamann, Christoph Buck, Severin Oesterle, Torsten Eymann, and Reinhard Meckl",
Doi= "https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_m5-goetz",
Abstract= "As a result of technological change and increasing digitalization, corporate and industry structures are changing. Due to a growing dynamic in the competitive environment, companies are forced to reinvent themselves. Digital and platform-based ecosystems represent a promising direction for rapid progress in competition and cooperation at the same time. From a strategic perspective, however, the question of sustainable management must be posed. The classic approach of the Resource-Based View (RBV) appears too static in the dynamic digital environment and must be supplemented by the Knowledge- Based View (KBV) or the Dynamic Capabilities View (DCV). This paper structures and analyzes the existing literature on digital ecosystems against the background of existing management theories. Within the framework of a structured literature review, we identify and analyze 23 relevant management publications. The extant literature shows an existing research gap with regard to the KBV and DCV.
",
Keywords= "Digital Ecosystems, Resource-Based View, Knowledge-Based View, Dynamic Capabilities View, Structured Literature Review.
",
}
Franziska Götz, Christian Hamann, Christoph Buck, Severin Oesterle, Torsten Eymann, and Reinhard Meckl: Dynamic Capabilities as the Key Approach to Investigate Digital Ecosystems. Online: https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_m5-goetz (Abgerufen 23.11.24)
Open Access
As a result of technological change and increasing digitalization, corporate and industry structures are changing. Due to a growing dynamic in the competitive environment, companies are forced to reinvent themselves. Digital and platform-based ecosystems represent a promising direction for rapid progress in competition and cooperation at the same time. From a strategic perspective, however, the question of sustainable management must be posed. The classic approach of the Resource-Based View (RBV) appears too static in the dynamic digital environment and must be supplemented by the Knowledge- Based View (KBV) or the Dynamic Capabilities View (DCV). This paper structures and analyzes the existing literature on digital ecosystems against the background of existing management theories. Within the framework of a structured literature review, we identify and analyze 23 relevant management publications. The extant literature shows an existing research gap with regard to the KBV and DCV.
Digital Ecosystems, Resource-Based View, Knowledge-Based View, Dynamic Capabilities View, Structured Literature Review.
1. Teece, D.J.: Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy 47, 1367–1387 (2018b)
2. Helfat, C.E., Raubitschek, R.S.: Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research Policy 47, 1391–1399 (2018)
3. Lütjen, H., Schultz, C., Tietze, F., Urmetzer, F.: Managing ecosystems for service innovation: A dynamic capability view. Journal of Business Research 104, 506–519 (2019)
4. Dass, M., Kumar, S.: Bringing product and consumer ecosystems to the strategic forefront. Business Horizons 57, 225–234 (2014)
5. Kapoor, R., Lee, J.M.: Coordinating and competing in ecosystems. Strat Mgmt J 34, 274– 296 (2013)
6. Adner, R., Kapoor, R.: Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves. Strat Mgmt J 37, 625–648 (2016)
7. Adner, R., Kapoor, R.: Value creation in innovation ecosystems. How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal 31, 306–333 (2010)
8. Adner, R.: Ecosystem as structure. An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management 43, 39–58 (2017)
9. Jacobides, M.G., Cennamo, C., Gawer, A.: Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal 39, 2255–2276 (2018)
10. Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Oghazi, P., Gebauer, H., Baines, T.: Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm. Journal of Business Research 104, 380–392 (2019)
11. Sklyar, A., Kowalkowski, C., Tronvoll, B., Sörhammar, D.: Organizing for digital servitization. Journal of Business Research 104, 450–460 (2019)
12. Holgersson, M., Granstrand, O., Bogers, M.: The evolution of intellectual property strategy in innovation ecosystems: Uncovering complementary and substitute appropriability regimes. Long Range Planning 51, 303–319 (2018)
13. Kumar, P., Dass, M., Kumar, S.: From competitive advantage to nodal advantage: Ecosystem structure and the new five forces that affect prosperity. Business Horizons 58, 469–481 (2015)
14. Järvi, K., Kortelainen, S.: Taking stock of empirical research on business ecosystems. A literature review. International journal of business and systems research 11, 215–228 (2017)
15. Scaringella, L., Radziwon, A.: Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 136, 59–87 (2018)
16. Senyo, P.K., Liu, K., Effah, J.: Digital business ecosystem: Literature review and a framework for future research. International Journal of Information Management 47, 52– 64 (2019)
17. Thomas, L.D.W., Autio, E., Gann, D.M.: Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context. AMP 28, 198–219 (2014)
18. Meynhardt, T., Chandler, J.D., Strathoff, P.: Systemic principles of value co-creation: Synergetics of value and service ecosystems. Journal of Business Research 69, 2981–2989 (2016)
19. Kapoor, R.: Ecosystems: broadening the locus of value creation. J Org Design 7, 39 (2018)
20. Moore, J.F.: Predators and prey. A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 75–86 (1993)
21. Moore, J.F.: The death of competition. Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. Harper Business, New York, NY (1996)
22. Iansiti, M., Levien, R.: The keystone advantage. What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass. (2004)
23. Adner, R.: Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 98–107 (2006)
24. Leten, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Roijakkers, N., Clerix, A., van Helleputte, J.: IP Models to Orchestrate Innovation Ecosystems: IMEC, a Public Research Institute in Nano- Electronics. California Management Review 55, 51–64 (2013)
25. Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A.: The organization of innovation in ecosystems. Problem framing, problem solving, and patterns of coupling. Advances in Strategic Management, 167–194 (2013)
26. Alexy, O., George, G., Salter, A.J.: Cui Bono? The Selective Revealing of Knowledge and Its Implications for Innovative Activity. AMR 38, 270–291 (2013)
27. West, J., Wood, D.: Evolving an open ecosystem. The rise and fall of the Symbian platform. Advances in Strategic Management, 27–67 (2013)
28. Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A.: Platform leadership. How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts (2002)
29. Cennamo, C., Santaló, J.: Platform competition. Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal 34, 1331–1350 (2013)
30. Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., Wu, D.J.: Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem. MIS Quarterly 36, 263–290 (2012)
31. Cennamo, C.: Building the value of next-generation platforms. The paradox of diminishing returns. Journal of Management 44, 3038–3069 (2018)
32. Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Ritala, P.: Network management in the era of ecosystems. Systematic review and management framework. Industrial Marketing Management 67 (2017), 23–36 (2017)
33. Powell, T.C.: Research notes and communications strategic planning as competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 13, 551–558 (1992)
34. Teece, D.J.: Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles. Advances in Strategic Management, 211–225 (2017)
35. Zeng, J., Khan, Z., Silva, M. de: The emergence of multi-sided platform MNEs: Internalization theory and networks. International Business Review 28, 101598 (2019)
36. Loux, P., Aubry, M., Tran, S., Baudoin, E.: Multi-sided platforms in B2B contexts: The role of affiliation costs and interdependencies in adoption decisions. Industrial Marketing Management (2019)
37. Hagiu, A., Wright, J.: Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization 43, 162–174 (2015)
38. Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C.: What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Information Management 11, 29–49 (2009)
39. Grant, R.M.: Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science 7, 375–387 (1996)
40. Kogut, B., Zander, U.: Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science 3, 383–397 (1992)
41. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The knowledge creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York (1995)
42. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A.: Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm. Management Science 40, 227–251 (1994)
43. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G.: An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1982)
44. Simonin, B.L.: Transfer of Marketing Know-How in International Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Investigation of the Role and Antecedents of Knowledge Ambiguity. J Int Bus Stud 30, 463–490 (1999)
45. Austerschulte, L.: Entwicklung einer Vorgehensweise zur Erstellung eines Messinstruments für einzelne Dynamic Capabilities. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden (2014)
46. Schilke, O., Hu, S., Helfat, C.E.: Quo Vadis, Dynamic Capabilities? A Content-Analytic Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Recommendations for Future Research. ANNALS 12, 390–439 (2018)
47. Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A.: Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal 21, 1105–1121 (2000)
48. Zahra, S.A., George, G.: Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. The Academy of Management Review 27, 185 (2002)
49. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A.: Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128 (1990)
50. Durach, C.F., Kembro, J., Wieland, A.: A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management. J Supply Chain Manag 53, 67–85 (2017)
51. Schrader, U., Hennig-Thurau, T.: VHB-JOURQUAL2: Method, Results, and Implications of the German Academic Association for Business Research’s Journal Ranking. Bus Res 2, 180–204 (2009)
52. Dyer, J.H., Singh, H.: The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Review 23, 660 (1998)
53. Grant, R.M., Nippa, M.: Strategisches Management. Analyse, Entwicklung und Implementierung von Unternehmensstrategien. Pearson Studium, München (2009)
54. Winter, S.G.: Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 24, 991– 995 (2003)
55. Wollersheim, J.: Dynamic Capabilities im Kontext von Mergers & Acquisitions. Gabler Verlag / Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2010)
56. Teece, D.J.: Reply to Nelson, Helfat and Raubitschek. Research Policy 47, 1400–1402 (2018c)
57. Tan, B., Pan, S., Lu, X., Huang, L.: The Role of IS Capabilities in the Development of Multi-Sided Platforms: The Digital Ecosystem Strategy of Alibaba.com. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 16 (2015)
58. Huang, P., Tafti, A., Mithas, S.: Platform Sponsor Investments and User Contributions in Knowledge Communities. MIS Quarterly 42, 213–240 (2018)
59. Cenamor, J., Parida, V., Wincent, J.: How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Research 100, 196–206 (2019)