Deutsch
Bibtex
Cite as text
@Select Types{,
Journal = "Band-1",
Title= "Visualize Different: Towards Researching the Fit Between Taxonomy Visualizations and Taxonomy Tasks",
Author= "Daniel Szopinski, Thorsten Schoormann, and Dennis Kundisch",
Doi= "https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_k9-szopinski",
Abstract= "Yet despite the great interest in taxonomies, there is virtually no guidance on how to purposefully visualize them. Interestingly, taxonomies are visualized in ways as diverse as morphological boxes, hierarchies and mathematical sets, to name three typical examples. As a result, taxonomy builders face the following question: Which type of taxonomy task is best supported by which type of taxonomy visualization? This short paper raises the awareness of the problem and lays ground for conducting controlled experiments that have the potential to purposefully leverage taxonomy visualizations. We present an experimental design that allows to investigate the cognitive fit between the different types of taxonomy visualizations and taxonomy tasks. Thus, we contribute towards researching whether taxonomy visualizations make a difference when performing certain tasks by using taxonomies.",
Keywords= "Taxonomy, Visualization, Cognitive Fit Theory, Experiment.
",
}
Daniel Szopinski, Thorsten Schoormann, and Dennis Kundisch: Visualize Different: Towards Researching the Fit Between Taxonomy Visualizations and Taxonomy Tasks. Online: https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_k9-szopinski (Abgerufen 26.12.24)
Open Access
Abstract
Abstract
Yet despite the great interest in taxonomies, there is virtually no guidance on how to purposefully visualize them. Interestingly, taxonomies are visualized in ways as diverse as morphological boxes, hierarchies and mathematical sets, to name three typical examples. As a result, taxonomy builders face the following question: Which type of taxonomy task is best supported by which type of taxonomy visualization? This short paper raises the awareness of the problem and lays ground for conducting controlled experiments that have the potential to purposefully leverage taxonomy visualizations. We present an experimental design that allows to investigate the cognitive fit between the different types of taxonomy visualizations and taxonomy tasks. Thus, we contribute towards researching whether taxonomy visualizations make a difference when performing certain tasks by using taxonomies.
Keywords
Schlüsselwörter
Taxonomy, Visualization, Cognitive Fit Theory, Experiment.
References
Referenzen
1. Nickerson, R.C., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems. 22, 336– 359 (2013).
2. Wand, Y., Monarchi, D.E., Parsons, J., Woo, C.C.: Theoretical foundations for conceptual modelling in information systems development. Decision Support Systems. 15, 285–304 (1995)
3. Oberländer, A.M., Lösser, B., Rau, D.: Taxonomy research in information systems: A systematic assessment. In: Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2019). Stockholm-Uppsala, Sweden (2019)
4. Szopinski, D., Schoormann, T., Kundisch, D.: Because your taxonomy is worth it: Towards a framework for taxonomy evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2019). Stockholm-Uppsala, Sweden (2019)
5. Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: On theory development in design science research: Anatomy of a research project. European Journal of Information Systems. 17, 489–504 (2008).
6. Galliers, R.D., Land, F.F.: Choosing appropriate information systems research approaches: A revised taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG8.2 (1990)
7. Feine, J., Gnewuch, U., Morana, S., Mädche, A.: A taxonomy of social cues for conversational agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. (2019).
8. Morana, S., Schacht, S., Scherp, A., Mädche, A.: A review of the nature and effects of guidance design features. Decision Support Systems. 97, 31–42 (2017).
9. Liu, X., He, S., Mädche, A.: Designing an AI-based advisory platform for design techniques. In: Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2019). Stockholm-Uppsala, Sweden (2019)
10. Szopinski, D., Schoormann, T., John, T., Knackstedt, R., Kundisch, D.: Software tools for business model innovation: Current state and future challenges. Electronic Markets. (2019).
11. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly. 37, 337–356 (2013)
12. Tversky, B.: Prolegomenon to scientific visualizations. In: Gilbert, J.K. (ed.) Visualization in science education. pp. 29–42. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands (2005).
13. Tversky, B.: Visualizing thought. Topics in cognitive science. 3, 499–535 (2011).
14. Tom, A.C., Tversky, B.: Remembering routes: Streets and landmarks. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 26, 182–193 (2012).
15. Charmantier, I., Müller-Wille, S.: Carl Linnaeus’s botanical paper slips (1767–1773). Intellectual History Review. 24, 215–238 (2014).
16. Bera, P., Burton-Jones, A., Wand, Y.: Guidelines for designing visual ontologies to support knowledge identification. MIS Quarterly. 2011, 883–908 (2011)
17. Maletic, J.I., Marcus, A., Collard, M.L.: A task oriented view of software visualization. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis (VISSOFT 2002). Paris, France (2002)
18. Moody, D.: The “physics” of notations: Toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 35, 756– 779 (2009)
19. Vessey, I.: Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sciences. 22, 219–240 (1991)
20. Vessey, I.: The theory of cognitive fit: One aspect of a general theory of problem solving? In: Zhang, P. and Galletta, D. (eds.) Human-computer interaction and management information systems. pp. 141–183. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY (2006)
21. Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., Acquisti, A.: Beyond the turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 70, 153–163 (2017).
22. Tversky, B., Corter, J.E., Yu, L., Mason, D.L., Nickerson, J.V.: Representing category and continuum: Visualizing thought. In: Hutchison, D., Kanade, T., Kittler, J., Kleinberg, J.M., Mattern, F., Mitchell, J.C., Naor, M., Nierstrasz, O., Pandu Rangan, C., Steffen, B., Sudan, M., Terzopoulos, D., Tygar, D., Vardi, M.Y., Weikum, G., Cox, P., Plimmer, B., and Rodgers, P. (eds.) Diagrammatic representation and inference. pp. 23–34. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012).
23. Bailey, B.P., Iqbal, S.T.: Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 14, 21:1–21:28 (2008).
24. Dimoka, A., Davis, F.D., Gupta, A., Pavlou, P.A., Banker, R.D., Dennis, A.R., Ischebeck, A., Müller-Putz, G., Benbasat, I., Gefen, D., Kenning, P.H., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Weber, B.: On the use of neurophysiological tools in IS research: Developing a research agenda for NeuroIS. MIS Quarterly. 36, 679–702 (2012).
25. Riedl, R., Davis, F., Hevner, A.: Towards a NeuroIS research methodology: Intensifying the discussion on methods, tools, and measurement. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 15, I–XXXV (2014).