Deutsch
Bibtex
Cite as text
@Select Types{,
Journal = "Band-1",
Title= "Gamified Helping? The Impact of Individualized and Group-Level Cooperative Evaluation on Knowledge Sharing",
Author= "Katharina Jahn, Bastian Kordyaka, Tobias Scholz, and Bjoern Niehaves",
Doi= "https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_d9-jahn",
Abstract= "Even though knowledge sharing is an important part of cooperation in organizations to ensure productivity and economic functioning, employees sometimes refrain from sharing knowledge with colleagues. Accompanied by the digital disruption of work, one fruitful way to improve organizational knowledge sharing between employees is the design of technology. However, which technological design elements improve knowledge sharing is still not well understood. This research-in-progress paper combines research on knowledge sharing with the common ingroup identity model to investigate the effect of individualized and group-level gamification design of cooperative evaluations on knowledge sharing behavior. We hypothesize that using grouplevel design facilitates intrinsic motivation for knowledge sharing by highlighting a superordinate identity. On the other hand, individualized design should enhance knowledge sharing by increasing extrinsic motivation. We plan to test these hypotheses using a 2 (individualized evaluation: badges vs. none) x 2 (group-level evaluation: badges vs. none) between-subjects experiment.
",
Keywords= "gamification, prosocial behavior, cooperation, experiment",
}
Katharina Jahn, Bastian Kordyaka, Tobias Scholz, and Bjoern Niehaves: Gamified Helping? The Impact of Individualized and Group-Level Cooperative Evaluation on Knowledge Sharing. Online: https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_d9-jahn (Abgerufen 26.12.24)
Open Access
Abstract
Abstract
Even though knowledge sharing is an important part of cooperation in organizations to ensure productivity and economic functioning, employees sometimes refrain from sharing knowledge with colleagues. Accompanied by the digital disruption of work, one fruitful way to improve organizational knowledge sharing between employees is the design of technology. However, which technological design elements improve knowledge sharing is still not well understood. This research-in-progress paper combines research on knowledge sharing with the common ingroup identity model to investigate the effect of individualized and group-level gamification design of cooperative evaluations on knowledge sharing behavior. We hypothesize that using grouplevel design facilitates intrinsic motivation for knowledge sharing by highlighting a superordinate identity. On the other hand, individualized design should enhance knowledge sharing by increasing extrinsic motivation. We plan to test these hypotheses using a 2 (individualized evaluation: badges vs. none) x 2 (group-level evaluation: badges vs. none) between-subjects experiment.
Keywords
Schlüsselwörter
gamification, prosocial behavior, cooperation, experiment
References
Referenzen
1. van den Hooff, B., Ridder, J.A. de: Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management. 8, 1367–3270 (2004).
2. van den Hooff, B., de Leeuw van Weenen, F.: Committed to share: commitment and CMC use as antecedents of knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management. 11, 13– 24 (2004).
3. Hsu, M.-H., Ju, T.L., Yen, C.-H., Chang, C.-M.: Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 65, 153–169 (2007).
4. Fehrenbacher, D.D.: Affect Infusion and Detection through Faces in Computer-mediated Knowledge-sharing Decisions. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 18, 703–726 (2017).
5. Constant, D., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L.: What’s Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing. Information Systems Research. 5, 400–421 (1994).
6. Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E.: Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly. 25, 107–136 (2001).
7. Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., Dixon, D.: Gamification. Using gamedesign elements in non-gaming contexts. In: Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems – CHI EA ’11. pp. 2425–2428. ACM Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2011).
8. Schöbel, S., Söllner, M., Leimeister, J.M.: The Agony of Choice – Analyzing User Preferences regarding Gamification Elements in Learning Management Systems. Presented at the International Conference of Information Systems (2017).
9. Morschheuser, B., Maedche, A., Walter, D.: Designing Cooperative Gamification: Conceptualization and Prototypical Implementation. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing – CSCW ’17. pp. 2410–2421. ACM Press, Portland, Oregon, USA (2017).
10. Morschheuser, B., Hamari, J., Maedche, A.: Cooperation or competition – When do people contribute more? A field experiment on gamification of crowdsourcing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 127, 7–24 (2019).
11. Bartol, K.M., Srivastava, A.: Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 9, 64– 76 (2002).
12. Bock, Zmud, Kim, Lee: Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly. 29, 87–111 (2005).
13. Wang, S., Noe, R.A.: Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review. 20, 115–131 (2010).
14. Rode, H.: To Share or not to Share: The Effects of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivations on Knowledge-sharing in Enterprise Social Media Platforms. Journal of Information Technology. 31, 152–165 (2016).
15. Lin, H.-F.: Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science. 33, 135–149 (2007).
16. Kankanhalli, Tan, Wei: Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly. 29, 113 (2005).
17. Baker, W.E., Bulkley, N.: Paying It Forward vs. Rewarding Reputation: Mechanisms of Generalized Reciprocity. Organization Science. 25, 1493–1510 (2014).
18. Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Anastasio, P.A., Bachman, B.A., Rust, M.C.: The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias. European Review of Social Psychology. 4, 1–26 (1993).
19. Gaertner, S.L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., Dovidio, J.F.: Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 57, 239–249 (1989).
20. Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D.H.J., Hawk, S.T., van Knippenberg, A.: Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition & Emotion. 24, 1377–1388 (2010).