English
Bibtex
Cite as text
@Select Types{,
Journal = "Band-1",
Title= "Embedding Digital Innovations in Organizations: A Typology for Digital Innovation Units",
Author= "Philipp Barthel, Christoph Fuchs, Bettina Birner, and Thomas Hess",
Doi= "https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_h1-barthel",
Abstract= "Embedding digital innovation into existing organizational structures poses a critical challenge to many established companies across all industries. One option that has drawn increased attention lately is the implementation of dedicated digital innovation units. However, it is yet unclear, how these units are designed to fit their specific objectives. Therefore, we develop a typology for these digital innovation units, identifying different types based on the objectives and respective design option patterns of these units. To do this, we follow a qualitative-empirical research approach, covering 23 real world instances of digital innovation units. We employ the loose-tight-coupling perspective as a theoretical lens to interpret and classify the observed design choices. We contribute to literature by identifying three ideal types of digital innovation units and provide insights for practitioners on how to set up this specific type of organizational units.",
Keywords= "Digital Innovation, Digital Innovation Units, Typology Development, Loose-Tight-Coupling",
}
Philipp Barthel, Christoph Fuchs, Bettina Birner, and Thomas Hess: Embedding Digital Innovations in Organizations: A Typology for Digital Innovation Units. Online: https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_h1-barthel (Abgerufen 24.11.24)
Open Access
Abstract
Abstract
Embedding digital innovation into existing organizational structures poses a critical challenge to many established companies across all industries. One option that has drawn increased attention lately is the implementation of dedicated digital innovation units. However, it is yet unclear, how these units are designed to fit their specific objectives. Therefore, we develop a typology for these digital innovation units, identifying different types based on the objectives and respective design option patterns of these units. To do this, we follow a qualitative-empirical research approach, covering 23 real world instances of digital innovation units. We employ the loose-tight-coupling perspective as a theoretical lens to interpret and classify the observed design choices. We contribute to literature by identifying three ideal types of digital innovation units and provide insights for practitioners on how to set up this specific type of organizational units.
Keywords
Schlüsselwörter
Digital Innovation, Digital Innovation Units, Typology Development, Loose-Tight-Coupling
References
Referenzen
1. Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., Song, M.: Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World. MIS Quarterly 41, 223- 238 (2017)
2. Fichman, R.G., Dos Santos, B.L., Zheng, Z.E.: Digital Innovation as a Fundamental and Powerful Concept in the Information Systems Curriculum. MIS Quarterly 38, 329-353 (2014)
3. Kohli, R., Melville, N.: Digital Innovation: A Review and Synthesis. Information Systems Journal 29, 200-223 (2019)
4. Wiesböck, F., Hess, T.: Digital Innovations. Electronic Markets (2019)
5. Yoo, Y., Boland Jr, R.J., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A.: Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World. Organization Science 23, 1398-1408 (2012)
6. Chan, C.M., Teoh, S.Y., Yeow, A., Pan, G.: Agility in Responding to Disruptive Digital Innovation: Case Study of an SME. Information Systems Journal 29, 436-455 (2019)
7. Haffke, I., Kalgovas, B.J., Benlian, A.: The Role of the CIO and the CDO in an Organization’s Digital Transformation. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1-20. (2016)
8. Sindemann, T., von Buttlar, H.: Konzerne auf den Spuren von Start-ups – Wie etablierte Unternehmen Innovation Labs, Acceleratoren und Inkubatoren als Instrument der digitalen Transformation nutzen. Infront Consulting & Management GmbH and Capital (2017)
9. Kreimeier, N.: Digilabs deutscher Konzerne arbeiten näher am Kernprodukt. Capital (2019)
10. Ebers, M.: Organisationsmodelle für Innovation. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 69, 81-109 (2017)
11. Fuchs, C., Barthel, P., Herberg, I., Berger, M., Hess, T.: Characterizing Approaches to Digital Transformation: Development of a Taxonomy of Digital Units. In: Proceedings of the 14th Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 632-646. (2019)
12. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Lyytinen, K.: Research Commentary—The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research 21, 724-735 (2010)
13. Arvidsson, V., Mønsted, T.: Generating Innovation Potential: How Digital Entrepreneurs Conceal, Sequence, Anchor, and Propagate New Technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 27, 369-383 (2018)
14. Tushman, M., Smith, W.K., Wood, R.C., Westerman, G., O’Reilly, C.: Organizational Designs and Innovation Streams. Industrial and Corporate Change 19, 1331-1366 (2010)
15. Dixon, J.A., Brohman, K., Chan, Y.E.: Dynamic Ambidexterity: Exploiting Exploration for Business Success in the Digital Age. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1-17. (2017)
16. Christensen, C.M.: The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, USA (2015)
17. Burgers, H., Jansen, J.J.: Organizational Ambidexterity and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Differential Effects on Venturing, Innovation and Renewal Processes. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 28, 1-16 (2008)
18. Boumgarden, P., Nickerson, J., Zenger, T.R.: Sailing into the Wind: Exploring the Relationships among Ambidexterity, Vacillation, and Organizational Performance. Strategic Management Journal 33, 587-610 (2012)
19. Kaltenecker, N., Hess, T., Huesig, S.: Managing Potentially Disruptive Innovations in Software Companies: Transforming from On-premises to the On-demand. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 24, 234-250 (2015)
20. Selcer, A., Decker, P.: The Structuration of Ambidexterity: An Urge for Caution in Organizational Design. International Journal of Organizational Innovation 5, 65-96 (2012)
21. Garcia, R., Calantone, R.: A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19, 110-132 (2002)
22. Orton, J.D., Weick, K.E.: Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review 15, 203-223 (1990)
23. Burgelman, R.A.: Designs for Corporate Entrepreneurship in Established Firms. California Management Review 26, 154-166 (1984)
24. Burke, W.W.: A Perspective on the Field of Organization Development and Change: The Zeigarnik Effect. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 47, 143-167 (2011)
25. Ravichandran, T.: Exploring the Relationships Between IT Competence, Innovation Capacity and Organizational Agility. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 27, 22- 42 (2018)
26. Akgün, A.E., Keskin, H., Byrne, J.: Antecedents and Contingent Effects of Organizational Adaptive Capability on Firm Product Innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29, 171-189 (2012)
27. Jansen, J.J., Tempelaar, M.P., Van den Bosch, F.A., Volberda, H.W.: Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms. Organization Science 20, 797-811 (2009)
28. Gulati, R., Garino, J.: Get the Right Mix of Bricks & Clicks. Harvard Business Review 78, 107-114 (2000)
29. Bailey, K.D.: Typologies and Taxonomies: An Introduction to Classification Techniques. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA (1994)
30. Doty, D.H., Glick, W.H.: Typologies as a Unique Form of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling. Academy of Management Review 19, 230-251 (1994)
31. Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., Kitsiou, S.: Synthesizing IS Knowledge: A Typology of Literature Reviews. Information & Management 52, 183-199 (2015)
32. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., Mead, M.: The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 11, 369-386 (1987)
33. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA (2013)
34. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review 14, 532-550 (1989)
35. Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA (2002)
36. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldana, J.: Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA (2013)