Bibtex
Cite as text
@Article{Lass+Körppen,
Cite-key = "Lass2023Dec",
Year= "2023",
Number= "1",
Volume= "Industry 4.0 Science 39",
Pages= "34-40",
Journal = "Industry 4.0 Science",
Title= "Decentralized Tact Time Control in Assembly Simplifying Robust Control of Assembly Lines via the I4.0 Box",
Author= "Sander Lass and Tim Körppen, University of Potsdam",
Doi= "https://doi.org/10.30844/I4SE.23.1.34",
Abstract= "In theory, decentralized control approaches in the manufacturing context offer several advantages over monolithic centralized systems where all functions are combined into one or into several authorities. However, practical implementation requires adaptation of the general concept of decentralization to fit individual and specific use cases, especially with regard to their sensible scope. One such use case is the assembly of highvariation
products. This article shows the appropriate combination of
centralized and decentralized approaches can be leveraged to achieve better planning and increased throughput in manufacturing. With flexible
cycle control for work stations and suitable assistance at the assembly workstation, the previous shop-floor oriented organization style can be
transformed into a series-like manufacturing process. This is done using a multi-layered infrastructure that follows the Industry 4.0 paradigm of
decentralized information processing through autonomous networked systems.",
Keywords= "individualized serialization, decentralized line control, manufacturing restructuring,
AI-based production planning, Industry 4.0 box, edge gateway, CPS, WIS, worker information system, automobile manufacturing, lightweight vehicle
manufacturing, smart factory, factory redesign, decentralized factory control",
}
Sander Lass and Tim Körppen, University of Potsdam(2023): Decentralized Tact Time Control in Assembly Simplifying Robust Control of Assembly Lines via the I4.0 Box. Industry 4.0 Science 391(2023), S. 34-40. Online: https://doi.org/10.30844/I4SE.23.1.34 (Abgerufen 21.12.24)
Open Access
In theory, decentralized control approaches in the manufacturing context offer several advantages over monolithic centralized systems where all functions are combined into one or into several authorities. However, practical implementation requires adaptation of the general concept of decentralization to fit individual and specific use cases, especially with regard to their sensible scope. One such use case is the assembly of highvariation products. This article shows the appropriate combination of centralized and decentralized approaches can be leveraged to achieve better planning and increased throughput in manufacturing. With flexible cycle control for work stations and suitable assistance at the assembly workstation, the previous shop-floor oriented organization style can be transformed into a series-like manufacturing process. This is done using a multi-layered infrastructure that follows the Industry 4.0 paradigm of decentralized information processing through autonomous networked systems.
individualized serialization, decentralized line control, manufacturing restructuring, AI-based production planning, Industry 4.0 box, edge gateway, CPS, WIS, worker information system, automobile manufacturing, lightweight vehicle manufacturing, smart factory, factory redesign, decentralized factory control
[1] Kletti, J.: Industrie 4.0: MES ermöglicht Dezentralisierung. Productivity Management, 20 (2015) 2, pp. 15-17.
[2] Aier, S.: Integrationstechnologien als Basis einer nachhaltigen Unternehmensarchitektur. Berlin 2007
[3] Böse, F.; Windt, K.: Catalogue of criteria for autonomous control in logistics. In Hülsmann, M.; Windt, K. (ed): Understanding autonomous cooperation and control in logistics: the impact of autonomy on management, information, communication and material flow. Berlin 2007.
[4] Lass, S.; Gronau, N.: A factory operating system for extending existing factories to industry 4.0. Computers in Industry (2020).
[5] Lee, E. A.: Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. In Object Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), 2008 11th IEEE International Symposium on, pages 363–369. IEEE 2008.
[6] acatech: acatech POSITION – Cyber-Physical Systems: Innovationsmotor für Mobilität, Gesundheit, Energie und Produktion. Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften. Berlin Heidelberg 2011.
[7] Kagermann, H.; Wahlster, W.; Helbig, J.: Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0 – Abschlussbericht; Acatech – Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften e.V. (2013).
[8] Lass, S.: Industrie 4.0 trotz Altsystemen – Integration bestehender Anlagen in cyber-physische Produktionssysteme. Industrie 4.0 Management, 33 (2017) 6.
[9] Hellenschmidt, M.; Wichert, R.: Selbstorganisation: Dinge in eigenverantwortlicher Kooperation. In Bullinger, H.-J. and Ten Hompel, M.(Hrsg.), Internet der Dinge. Berlin Heidelberg 2007.