Direkt zum Inhalt
WI2020 Zentrale Tracks
Enriching E-Participation through Augmented Reality: First Results of a Qualitative Study

Jonas Fegert1, 2, Jella Pfeiffer3, Christian Peukert2, and Christof Weinhardt2, 1
1 FZI Research Center for Information Technology, Information Management and Analytics, Karlsruhe, Germany; 2 KIT Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Information Systems and Marketing, Karlsruhe, Germany;
3 Justus Liebig University Giessen, Chair of Digitalization, E-Business and Operations Management, Giessen, Germany

Recent disputes over public construction projects show that the public is interested in urban development. When construction projects lack communication about its impact, agenda and costs, citizens might feel overheard and protests may arise. As a consequence, trust in public administration and politics could suffer serious damage. Following the idea of digital government, it is crucial not only to replicate and digitize established participation procedures, but rather to include new possibilities that e-participation offers. In this article, we present preliminary results of a qualitative study on using augmented reality for e-participation. Based on the study’s results, we derive metarequirements for an e-participation application employing this technology. Interestingly, our empirical findings suggest that users only seek information via the application up to a certain level of participation.

Schlüsselwörter: Digital Government, E-Participation, Qualitative Research, Augmented Reality
Quellen:

1. Brettschneider, F.: Großprojekte zwischen Protest und Akzeptanz: Legitimation durch Kommunikation. In: Brettschneider, F., Schuster, W. (eds.) Stuttgart 21: Ein Großprojekt zwischen Protest und Akzeptanz. pp. 319–328. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2013)
2. Thaa, W.: „Stuttgart 21“ – Krise oder Repolitisierung der repräsentativen Demokratie? Politische Vierteljahresschrift. 54, 1–20. Springer VS, Wiesbaden (2013)
3. Falk, S., Römmele, A., Silverman, M.: The Promise of Digital Government. In: Falk, S., Römmele, A., and Silverman, M. (eds.) Digital Government: Leveraging Innovation to Improve Public Sector Performance and Outcomes for Citizens. pp. 3–23. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)
4. Thiel, S.-K., Fröhlich, P., Sackl, A.: Nutzerorientierte Gestaltung von interaktiver EPartizipation. In: Leitner, M. (ed.) Digitale Bürgerbeteiligung: Forschung und Praxis – Chancen und Herausforderungen der elektronischen Partizipation. pp. 127–161. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2018)
5. Wilson, A., Tewdwr-Jones, M., Comber, R.: Urban planning, public participation and digital technology: App development as a method of generating citizen involvement in local planning processes. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. 46, 286–302. SAGE Publishing, Thousand Oaks (2019)
6. Du, G., Degbelo, A., Kray, C.: Public Displays for Public Participation in Urban Settings: A Survey. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. pp. 17:1–17:9. ACM, New York (2017)
7. Rese, A., Baier, D., Geyer-Schulz, A., Schreiber, S.: How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 124, 306–319. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2017)
8. Javornik, A.: Augmented reality: Research agenda for studying the impact of its media characteristics on consumer behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 30, 252–261. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2016)
9. Scholz, J., Smith, A.N.: Augmented reality: Designing immersive experiences that maximize consumer engagement. Business Horizons. 59, 149–161. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2016)
10. 10. Pantano, E., Rese, A., Baier, D.: Enhancing the online decision-making process by using augmented reality: A two country comparison of youth markets. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 38, 81–95. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2017)
11. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems. 24, 45–77. Taylor & Francis Online, Milton Park (2007)
12. Macintosh, A.: Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making. In: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04) - Track 5 - Volume 5. pp. 50117.1. IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC (2004)
13. Sanford, C., Rose, J.: Characterizing eParticipation. International Journal of Information Management. 27, 406–421. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)
14. International Association for Public Participation: IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation, https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/Spectrum_8.5x11_Print.pdf (Accesed: 20.07.2019)
15. Nelimarkka, M., Nonnecke, B., Krishnan, S., Aitumurto, T., Catterson, D., Crittenden, C., Garland, C., Gregory, C., Huang, C.-C. (Allen), Newsom, G., Patel, J., Scott, J., Goldberg, K.: Comparing Three Online Civic Engagement Platforms using the Spectrum of Public Participation. Berkeley (2014)
16. Nabatchi, T.: Putting the “Public” Back in Public Values Research: Designing Participation to Identify and Respond to Values. Public Administration Review. 72, 699–708. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken (2012)
17. Sutherland, I.E.: The Ultimate Display. In: Proceedings of the IFIP Congress. 506–508. Cambridge (1965)
18. Azuma, R.T.: A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments. 6, 355–385. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)
19. Kind, S., Ferdinand, J.-P., Jetzke, T., Richter, S., Weide, S.: Virtual und Augmented Reality. Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag, Berlin (2019)
20. Goudarznia, T., Pietsch, M., Krug, R.: Testing the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality in the Public Participation Process: A Case Study in the City of Bernburg. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture. 2, 244-251. Wichmann Verlag, Berlin (2017)
21. Allen, M., Regenbrecht, H., Abbott, M.: Smart-phone Augmented Reality for Public Participation in Urban Planning. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. 11–20. ACM, New York (2011)
22. Kaiser, R.: Qualitative Experteninterviews: Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und praktische Durchführung. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2014)
23. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science. 46, 186–204. INFORMS, Cantonville (2000)
24. Pereira, G. V., Rinnerbauer, B., Ginner, M., Parycek, P.: Categorizing Obstacles in e- Government: Formal and Informal. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. 157–166. ACM, New York (2017)