Joining Forces: Understanding Organizational Roles in Inter-organizational Smart Service Systems Engineering

Bibtex

@Select Types{,
  
   
  
   
  title    = "Joining Forces: Understanding Organizational Roles in Inter-organizational Smart Service Systems Engineering", 
  author    = "Jürgen Anke, Jens Poeppelbuss, and Rainer Alt", 
  doi    = "https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_j1-anke", 
  abstract    = "The combination of technologies like the Internet of Things, big data analytics, and cloud computing allow service systems to become “smart”. To design and operate smart service systems, a multitude of skills, knowledge, services, and components are required. These are unlikely to be found within a single organization, and, hence, inter-organizational projects are formed for smart service systems engineering. In our study, we explored the interorganizational setups of 14 projects by interviewing experts who were involved in smart service systems engineering. Our analysis resulted in a conceptualization of 13 roles that we further clustered into three main groups. With this systematization of roles, we contribute to academia by advancing our understanding of the inter-organizational dimension of smart service systems engineering. Our insights are helpful for practitioners in setting up and managing inter-organizational projects for their digital service innovation initiatives.

", 
  keywords    = "Smart service, smart service systems, service engineering, interorganizational projects, stakeholder integration", 
}

Abstract

Abstract

The combination of technologies like the Internet of Things, big data analytics, and cloud computing allow service systems to become “smart”. To design and operate smart service systems, a multitude of skills, knowledge, services, and components are required. These are unlikely to be found within a single organization, and, hence, inter-organizational projects are formed for smart service systems engineering. In our study, we explored the interorganizational setups of 14 projects by interviewing experts who were involved in smart service systems engineering. Our analysis resulted in a conceptualization of 13 roles that we further clustered into three main groups. With this systematization of roles, we contribute to academia by advancing our understanding of the inter-organizational dimension of smart service systems engineering. Our insights are helpful for practitioners in setting up and managing inter-organizational projects for their digital service innovation initiatives.

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Smart service, smart service systems, service engineering, interorganizational projects, stakeholder integration

References

Referenzen

1. Georgakopoulos, D., Jayaraman, P.P.: Internet of things. Computing. 98, 1041–1058 (2016).
2. Allmendinger, G., Lombreglia, R.: Four strategies for the age of smart services. Harvard Business Review. 83, 131 (2005).
3. Herterich, M., Uebernickel, F., Brenner, W.: The Impact of Cyber-physical Systems on Industrial Services in Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. 30, 323–328 (2015).
4. Dreyer, S., Olivotti, D., Lebek, B., Breitner, M.H.: Focusing the customer through smart services: a literature review. Electron Markets. 29, 55–78 (2019).
5. Nambisan, S.: Information technology and product/service innovation: A brief assessment and some suggestions for future research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 14, 1 (2013).
6. Abrell, T., Pihlajamaa, M., Kanto, L., vom Brocke, J., Uebernickel, F.: The role of users and customers in digital innovation: Insights from B2B manufacturing firms. Information & Management. 53, 324–335 (2016).
7. Chowdhury, S., Haftor, D., Pashkevich, N.: Smart Product-Service Systems (Smart PSS) in Industrial Firms: A Literature Review. Procedia CIRP. 73, 26–31 (2018).
8. Jussen, P., Kuntz, J., Senderek, R., Moser, B.: Smart Service Engineering. Procedia CIRP. 83, 384–388 (2019).
9. Sklyar, A., Kowalkowski, C., Tronvoll, B., Sörhammar, D.: Organizing for digital servitization: A service ecosystem perspective. Journal of Business Research. 104, 450– 460 (2019).
10. Storbacka, K., Brodie, R.J., Böhmann, T., Maglio, P.P., Nenonen, S.: Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation. Journal of Business Research. (2016).
11. Sydow, J.: Path dependencies in project-based organizing: Evidence from television production in Germany. Journal of Media Business Studies. 6, 123–139 (2009).
12. Aaltonen, K., Ahola, T., Artto, K.: Something old, something new: Path dependence and path creation during the early stage of a project. International Journal of Project Management. 35, 749–762 (2017).
13. Beverungen, D., Müller, O., Matzner, M., Mendling, J., Vom Brocke, J.: Conceptualizing smart service systems. Electron Markets. 29, 7–18 (2019).
14. Medina-Borja, A.: Editorial Column—Smart Things as Service Providers. Service Science. 7, ii–v (2015).
15. Lim, C., Maglio, P.P.: Data-driven understanding of smart service systems through text mining. Service Science. 10, 154–180 (2018).
16. Beuren, F.H., Ferreira, M.G.G., Miguel, P.A.C.: Product-service systems: a literature review on integrated products and services. Journal of Cleaner Production. 47, 222–231 (2013).
17. Beverungen, D., Matzner, M., Janiesch, C.: Information systems for smart services. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage. 15, 781–787 (2017).
18. Blaschke, M.: Design principles for digital value co-creation networks—A servicedominant logic perspective. Electronic Markets. (2019).
19. Bullinger, H.-J., Fähnrich, K.-P., Meiren, T.: Service engineering—methodical development of new service products. International Journal of Production Economics. 85, 275–287 (2003).
20. Böhmann, T., Leimeister, J.M., Möslein, K.: Service Systems Engineering. Bus Inf Syst Eng. 6, 73–79 (2014).
21. Beverungen, D., Lüttenberg, H., Wolf, V.: Recombinant Service Systems Engineering. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 21, 50 (2018).
22. Yoo, Y., Lyytinen, K.J., Boland, R.J., Berente, N.: The Next Wave of Digital Innovation: Opportunities and Challenges: A Report on the Research Workshop “Digital Challenges in Innovation Research.” Available at SSRN 1622170. (2010).
23. Lim, C.-H., Kim, M.-J., Heo, J.-Y., Kim, K.-J.: Design of informatics-based services in manufacturing industries. J Intell Manuf. 50, 181 (2015).
24. Hagen, S., Kammler, F., Thomas, O.: Adapting Product-Service System Methods for the Digital Era: Requirements for Smart PSS Engineering. In: Hankammer, S., Nielsen, K., Piller, F.T., Schuh, G., and Wang, N. (eds.) Customization 4.0. pp. 87–99. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018).
25. Patricio, L., Fisk, R.P., Falcao e Cunha, J., Constantine, L.: Multilevel Service Design: From Customer Value Constellation to Service Experience Blueprinting. J. Serv. Res. 14, 180–200 (2011).
26. Blaschke, M., Riss, U., Haki, K., Aier, S.: Design principles for digital value co-creation networks: a service-dominant logic perspective. Electron Markets. (2019).
27. Jonas, J.M., Roth, A.: Stakeholder integration in service innovation – an exploratory case study in the healthcare industry. International Journal of Technology Management. (2017).
28. Jonas, J.M., Roth, A., Möslein, K.M.: Stakeholder integration for service innovation in German medium-sized enterprises. Service Science. 8, 320–332 (2016).
29. Ekman, P., Raggio, R.D., Thompson, S.M.: Service network value co-creation: Defining the roles of the generic actor. Industrial Marketing Management. 56, 51–62 (2016).
30. Meier, H., Roy, R., Seliger, G.: Industrial product-service systems—IPS2. CIRP annals. 59, 607–627 (2010).
31. Gumm, D.C.: Distribution dimensions in software development projects: A taxonomy. IEEE software. 23, 45–51 (2006).
32. Sydow, J., Braun, T.: Projects as temporary organizations: An agenda for further theorizing the interorganizational dimension. Int J Proj Manag. 36, 4–11 (2018).
33. Manning, S.: The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects. Research Policy. 46, 1399–1415 (2017).
34. Kambil, A., Short, J.E.: Electronic Integration and Business Network Redesign: A Roles- Linkage Perspective. J. of Management Information Systems. 10, 59–84 (1994).
35. Hevner, A., Malgonde, O.: Effectual application development on digital platforms. Electron Markets. (2019).
36. Knight, L., Harland, C.: Managing Supply Networks: Organizational Roles in Network Management. European Management Journal. 23, 281–292 (2005).
37. Janowicz-Panjaitan, M., Noorderhaven, N.G.: Trust, Calculation, and Interorganizational Learning of Tacit Knowledge: An Organizational Roles Perspective. Organization Studies. 30, 1021–1044 (2009).
38. Rese, A., Gemünden, H.-G., Baier, D.: ‘Too Many Cooks Spoil The Broth’: Key Persons and their Roles in Inter-Organizational Innovations. Creativity and Innovation Management. 22, 390–407 (2013).
39. Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J.M.: Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: a multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 18, 628–649 (2016).
40. Barile, S., Lusch, R., Reynoso, J., Saviano, M., Spohrer, J.: Systems, networks, and ecosystems in service research. Journal of Service Management. (2016).
41. Ostrom, A.L., Parasuraman, A., Bowen, D.E., Patrício, L., Voss, C.A.: Service Research Priorities in a Rapidly Changing Context. Journal of Service Research. 18, 127–159 (2015).
42. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review. 14, 532–550 (1989).
43. Yin, R.K.: Qualitative Research from Start to Finish, (ed.). New York. (2016).
44. Schuster, R., Motal, T.: From e3-value to REA: Modeling Multi-party E-business Collaborations. In: 2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing. pp. 202–208. IEEE (2009).

Most viewed articles

Meist angesehene Beiträge

GITO events | library.gito